STAGG FIDUCIARY SERVICES
Escalation Timeline — 2353 Green St
Occupants given formal 3-month window to vacate
Progress check — is occupancy movement visible?
Engage counsel → Issue 30/60-day official conviction notice
Cameron full walk-through — improvement ROI analysis
Highest-and-best sale — target market pricing
Decisions Made
6-
Occupants granted 3-month window to vacate before escalation
Parallel property provides Fiduciary with operational flexibility -
If no movement at 3 months → engage legal counsel for eviction notice
Protecting five+ waiting beneficiaries -
$430K appraisal deemed fair value for the smaller (secondary) property
Initial comp estimate of $530K was too wide; appraiser engaged -
Post-vacancy: improvement decisions held until Cameron does full walk-through
ROI threshold analysis required before any spend -
Neighbor Nate: willing to sell to him if he pays top price — no discount
"If he's still willing to pay top price, let him have it" — Cameron -
Cameron recorded meeting (video + audio) for record-keeping
Documentation of neighbor exchange captured separately
Action Items
7-
1Get Nate's phone number from Rich → Introduce self, set clear boundariesNate (last name unknown) is on the main road directly behind the property, not Green St. He has been digging, cutting trees, and accessing property without authorization. Do not allow activity that exposes trust to liability.UrgentCameron + Rich
-
2Monitor Nate's activity at the property on an ongoing basisHe often isn't present and doesn't answer door. Phone contact is the primary channel. Rich has prior contact history.ActiveAll Parties
-
3Maintain 3-month occupancy clock — track milestone for Sept 2026 progress reviewIf beneficiaries are still blocked at that point, Fiduciary will not tolerate further delay.ActiveStagg Fiduciary
-
4Obtain and transfer Window World warranty paperworkWindows were installed by Window World; transferable warranties are available. Paperwork is held by the occupants/estate.Pending VacancyOccupants / Team
-
5Post-vacancy: full property walk-through + improvement ROI analysisThreshold question: does the spend move the needle on highest-and-best value? Evaluate especially given neighborhood condition context.Pending VacancyCameron White
-
6Tuesday: platform onboarding session with Julie (Sauna)Cameron to walk Julie through the platform — she needs guidance on where to respond and workflow basics.ScheduledCameron + Julie
-
7Consult legal counsel — prepare conviction notice template in advance30 or 60-day notice (TBD by counsel). Do not wait until the last moment; have documents ready to deploy.Prep NowStagg / Counsel
Open Questions
5-
?
Will Nate actually follow through on buying the property — and at what price?
-
?
Which improvements (if any) clear the ROI threshold for highest-and-best at 2353 Green St?
-
?
What is the realistic post-improvement market value range for 2353 Green St?
-
?
Will occupants move voluntarily within 3 months, or will legal escalation be required?
-
?
Back door does not latch — is this a safety/security issue to address before listing?
Key Quotes
"The goal now is to make sure we just get highest and best, and get the right thing, so everyone makes as much as we can." — Cameron White
"We don't ever want to evict. We don't ever want to be that. But it just gets a little more pressure — and it's affecting the other beneficiaries who are waiting." — Fiduciary / Cameron
"There's a threshold: does this make sense to do, or does it not make sense to do? How does it affect ROI for highest and best?" — Cameron White
"If he's still willing to pay top price for that house, let him have it." — Cameron (re: Neighbor Nate)
Property Intelligence — 2353 Green St
Attendees & Key Parties
Stagg Fiduciary Agent
Platform Onboarding (Tue)
Has Nate's phone #
Provided property intel
Communicated with Nate
6 Beneficiaries
Watchlist — Neighbor Nate
- ⛔ Dug holes along parking strip
- ⛔ Cut trees around the house
- ⛔ Dumped material in garbage cans
- ⛔ Ignoring requests to stop
- ⛔ Often absent / doesn't answer door
- 🟡 Expressed interest in buying — unconfirmed
- 🟡 Was never the legal owner; acts with false sense of ownership
- 📞 Phone number: get from Rich
- 📍 Location: rear of property on main road, not Green St
Post-Mortem Evaluation — Risks & Blind Spots
If Nate's unauthorized activity (digging, tree cutting) causes damage or injury, the trust could face liability. No formal cease-and-desist has been issued yet. This gap needs to close fast — verbal requests have failed.
3-month window is generous given 5 other waiting beneficiaries. If occupants sense no urgency, they may simply wait it out. Consider whether any interim pressure mechanism (formal letter vs. verbal) would accelerate voluntary compliance.
The $430K appraisal was for the secondary (smaller) property — not 2353 Green St itself. No firm value has been established for the subject property. Appraisal or CMA needed post-vacancy to set listing strategy.
"Does this make sense?" is still an open question. Without a specific ROI floor defined (e.g., every $1 in → $1.50 out), improvement decisions are subjective. Define a threshold before the walk-through.
Cameron recorded video and audio of the meeting — especially the neighbor incident exchange. This is the right move for a trust/fiduciary context. Evidence chain is protected.
Having a second property to work on simultaneously gives Fiduciary leverage — the 3-month window isn't idle time. Use it productively on the other asset while pressure builds here.
